Caravaggio/Rembrandt

 



1. How did Schama approach Rembrandt differently them Caravaggio? (aside from the facts) ?

- Rembrandt: Schama focuses on how the Dutch Republic's wealthy, reflective values are reflected in Rembrandt's artwork. According to Schama, Rembrandt's paintings—particularly his biblical portrayals and portraits—are about people's mental and emotional states as well as the difficulties associated with moral conflict and self-identity. Schama additionally emphasizes Rembrandt's less aggressive use of darkroom painting, or light and shadow, which produces a comfortable atmosphere that compels comprehension and contemplation. Caravaggio: Schama draws attention to the artist's dark aesthetic and his own feelings of empathy with the brutal and eerie aspects of existence in Caravaggio. He describes how Caravaggio employs chiaroscuro to emphasize the "weight" of the subjects and give his paintings an "intense" appearance. Rembrandt's style is more relaxed, whereas Caravaggio's is violent in nature.   Caravaggio's paintings have more dramatic moments and intense feelings than Rembrandt's, which portray serene scenes. The artist's work and his wild life, which entailed continuous violence, are integrated together, and it is this life that spills onto the canvas, bringing raw emotion to his paintings.

2.  Schama combined historical locations with theatrical reenactment. Which was more effective? Why?


- In my humble opinion, theatrical reenactment works better. Seeing the characters come to life on stage instead of only in their paintings is more captivating.   I was better able to understand and sympathize with their experiences as I watched their lives develop on stage. The stories felt more genuine since I was living their lives instead of just hearing about them. Most significantly, a live performance provided an insight into their personal histories, revealing some of the difficulties they had while developing their works.


3. Schama does not use expert interviews like Marlow, Bruce (from previous lessons and videos), and Hockney. How does this affect your experience? Does it seem more / less credible? Please be specific and explain your thoughts clearly.

-  The entire film appears more like a movie because there aren't any expert interviews, which has advantages and disadvantages of its own. Although it has the sense of a motion picture, you are totally immersed in it and practically put yourself in the story. It unquestionably appears to be less reliable without the expert interviews, but that isn't very significant. I want to examine the movie from a more critical perspective now that expert interviews have been added. Overall, both have advantages, but it's much more beneficial to totally devote yourself rather than avoiding such expert interviews.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

POST 2: Manet: How Impressionism's Most Controversial Artist Craved Notoriety AND The Father of Impressionism

Image
  1: Why is Manet considered the father of Impressionism? Édouard Manet's pivotal role in the genesis of Impressionism is widely acknowledged. His departure from conventional academic techniques, characterized by his utilization of loose brushwork, vibrant color palettes, and a focus on luminosity over meticulous detail, established the foundational aesthetic principles that would define the Impressionist movement 2: What is Manet's most significant contribution to art? Manet's groundbreaking contribution to art lies in his ability to dismantle the boundaries of Realism, thereby forging a pathway to Impressionism and establishing a new paradigm for modern artistic expression. Manet's work, exemplified by its abrupt color transitions and unconventional stylistic choices, initially provoked strong opposition from his contemporaries. However, these very elements, which were deemed objectionable at the time, are precisely what render his art so compelling to modern audience...
Read more

FILM 3- MODERN MARVELS - PAINT (Run time-44:18)

Image
       What is Paint? What are the parts that make it up? What are its purposes? Paint is a material used for surface protection, art creation, and color addition. Pigment, binder, solvent, and additives make up this mixture. The binder helps the paint stick to surfaces by holding the pigment particles together while the pigment gives the color and opacity. The solvent makes the paint simpler to apply by adjusting its thickness, and it evaporates as the paint dries. Properties and mold protection are improved by additives. There are numerous varieties of paints. The development of oil paint, the production of synthetic pigments, and the introduction of acrylic paint were the three most important advancements in paint technology.  Oil Paint (15th Century): Developed and popular by artists such as Jan van Eyck, oil paint produced detailed, realistic artwork, as demonstrated by Michelangelo and Leonardo da Vinci. It also allowed for smoother mixing, longer drying t...
Read more

FILM 8 - DAVID / SCHAMA

Image
  One question about David that is specifically related to his artmaking should be asked and answered. Question: How did Jacques-Louis David incorporate classical themes into his artmaking? - Jacques-Louis David used the themes and forms of classical antiquity to express political and moral ideas. David emphasized themes of duty, sacrifice, and allegiance to the state in his painting The Oath of the Horatii (1784) by drawing on a story from Roman tradition. Strong lines, symmetry, and clarity—all characteristics of classical art—are present in his compositions, and the characters in his paintings frequently have idealized, sculpture-like forms that resemble ancient statues. David's artworks aligned with the "Enlightenment" ideas of his day by utilizing these components to promote the aesthetic and ideological idea of classical virtues. Question: How does Simon Schama address the tension between David’s artistic ideals and his political actions during the Revolution? - Sch...
Read more