Film 2: Seurat / Bugler

 

1. Who made this documentary? Why should we believe their story? If you never see the narrator but only the interview subjects does it change how you perceive the stories?

  • it's the BBC (British Broadcasting Corporation). This is significant. The BBC is generally known for its journalistic standards, commitment to accuracy, and historical documentaries. This lends credibility to the production.We should believe their story because BBC's reputation for factual reporting . Likely use of expert interviews (art historians, curators, artists themselves , Potential use of archival footage or images to support the claims , The BBC often cites its sources and strives for balance. A lack of a traditional narrator can create a sense of immediacy and authenticity. It allows the viewer to connect directly with the subjects' experiences and perspectives. It can make the documentary feel less like a lecture and more like a collection of personal stories.

2. Have you ever seen this painting for real? Tell me about it. OR 

  • No , i havent seen this painting .

3. Which is more interesting to you an artist making a different picture every day like Van Gogh or the cavemen or spending 2 -4  years on a painting like Seurat or Michelangelo? Why? Which would you do? How would it change your life or our world? 

  • In my prespective an artist make a different picture everyday is more intriguing because you want something that fresh and up to date because it give you a glismpe of a person going through trials and errors of what they like and how the progessive of an artist . It would change your life because it could lead to a vast body of work, potentially documenting a specific era or culture in great detail.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

POST 2: Manet: How Impressionism's Most Controversial Artist Craved Notoriety AND The Father of Impressionism

FILM 3- MODERN MARVELS - PAINT (Run time-44:18)

FILM 8 - DAVID / SCHAMA